Are you prepared for an increase in tenancy fraud?

The pandemic has had an adverse impact on a number buy-to-let landlords, with both costs and risks increasing as a result of a rise in job losses amongst renters, which is putting them in rental arrears.

Around 840,000 renters have built up arrears and more than half – 56% – of landlords have lost income during the pandemic, while a new report has identified a significant rise in fraudulent applications.

According to data from Homeppl, there was a 71% increase in the number of fraudulent applications between the second half of 2020 and the first half of 2021 meaning that one in 50 rental applications are now fraudulent, rising to one in 20 in London.

Not only are landlords having to deal with the financial consequences of fraudulent applications – legal costs and lost rent mean each fraudulent tenant costs more than £30,000 – but the tenant themselves is at very little risk, as Alexander Siedes, CEO and Founder of Homeppl explains.

He said: “The consequences for landlords of inadvertently approving a fraudulent application are dire – up to £30,000 in lost income and legal costs and fines of up to £3,000 for renting to a tenant with no legal right to rent in the UK – but for the tenant, there is little risk. In a worst-case scenario, scammers will lose their holding deposit, but there is little to de-incentivise them from making further fraudulent applications.

“When you add to that the softening of eviction regulation which means landlords have less power to evict fraudulent tenants, increasingly, scammers are renting properties with the intention of illegally subletting them to make easy money, at a huge cost and risk to the landlord.”

Siedes says that the fact there is no consequence for the fraudulent tenant means they will simply keep trying, and due to the sophistication of most fraudulent applications, many will succeed.

“It has therefore never been more important for agents to ensure they have access to the latest verification technology, fraud detection tests, behavioural analysis, and financial algorithms,” said Siedes, “as well as Open Banking data, so they can ensure they can accurately and safely facilitate tenant referencing to approve legitimate tenants and avoid losing thousands from fraudulent activity.”


Comments 1

  1. I would be interested in seeing a profile of the nationalities of those who try to obtain or succeed in obtaining a tenancy fraudulently. This may not be collected as everyone is always fearful of being called ‘racist.’ I receive quite a few enquiries from evident scammers and I think they are all foreign – it seems they are likely to want to set up a cannabis farm and/or sub-let illegally. These appear to be non-British but it’s not clear what nationality at the point of enquiring – their poor English gives them away though, along with their desire to pay 3 x the rent or all the rent in advance etc. In addition some locals make fraudulent applications – these are the type who know how to play the system and are usually looking to get the property, and then to not pay the rent and maybe also damage the property. So there is a different profile for each type. The former want to squeeze everything they can out of the property, raking in a large illegal income.

Leave a Reply